I have such divided feelings about this franchise.
GTA3 and Vice City were two of the greatest games of all time. Then they broke the interface for San Andreas, which I never really played much because they abandoned my favourite stick layout.
GTA4 still doesn't have the alternate stick layout. But it is much better than San Andreas, with a story that's actually kinda cool. But ... there's something missing. Maybe it takes itself too seriously or something?
So I'll probably buy a used copy of GTA5 eventually. Like, 2015. When it's flooded the market and is really cheap.
You and I sir are in complete disagreement. I have been gaming for 25 years and I have to say..... the original storyline for GTA4 (not the expansions) was one of the 5 worst games I have ever seen and one of the 3 games I could just not dredge through. I was so excited for it because GTA:San Andreas was one of the better games made in the Xbox/PS2 era and I will play through bad storylines (Neverwinter Nights anyone?) just to complete a game to say I did it. After the first night of playing it on launch day, it sat on my shelf for 3 months before I flipped it on Craigslist. Not only was the storyline better in GTA:SA, the game was longer, had a ton more depth, more challenging- queue the hate for 'Learn to Fly' and the second to last mission where you have to save the Hispanic guy who runs out into ~20 enemies constantly with full automatics and good aim, and the map had much more room for exploration.