For those of you who don't know, this is the movie (and I use that term loosely) that has supposedly caused all the recent unrest in the Middle East. It's called Innocence of Muslims, and I just finished watching it. It's pretty awful.
By "awful" I don't mean insulting to Muslims. It is that, for sure. In fact it seems to go out of its way to accuse Muslims in general and Mohammed in particular of any and every terrible thing they can think of. According to the film, Mohammed was an incestuous, homosexual madman who likes fat chicks and is henpecked. He also bears an inexplicable resemblance to Jesus. Plus a whole bunch of other stuff that was meant to rile. But that's not why I say it's awful. I mean it's one of the worst written, worst directed, worst shot, worst acted pieces of steaming excrement I have ever seen committed to celluloid. (This last is meant metaphorically, of course; the film was shot on video.) It's barely even coherent. It is of a caliber routinely surpassed by middle schoolers making a camp video (I know this for a fact -- at the camp where I worked this summer the kids made a video and it was WAY better than Innocence of Muslims). It was clearly shot on a very low budget, and seems to have been specifically meant to piss off a certain class of militant fundamentalist Muslim.
The guy who made it, who goes by the name Sam Bassil, is a convicted con man and Coptic Christian from Egypt (there's a scene in the movie of Muslim Egyptian forces oppressing Christians; at least I think that's what's going on, it's not entirely clear). For those of you who don't know, Coptic Christians are a small sect that split from mainstream Christianity long, long ago, before there was even a Roman Catholic Church as we know it. Their doctrines differ substantially from mainline Christianity in many ways, but they tend to be quite conservative, at least the devout ones. Funny how religio-fascists are always conservatives, eh? Anyway, they're no angels themselves, and there is even a Coptic underground resistance-style movement. No doubt this film was made as propaganda for that movement. That a film of this quality (or lack thereof) was deemed substantive enough to serve that purpose does not speak volumes about the intelligence of the average member of the Coptic underground. Then again, if the goal was to rile up the crazy Muslims then I guess it worked. We have a dead ambassador to prove it.
If I were arguing the stupidity of religion like a legal suit (Stafford v. Yahweh), I could rest my case now.
The Innocence of Muslims
Started By
ᗅᗺᗷᗅ
, Sep 17 2012 04:57 PM
86 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 17 September 2012 - 04:57 PM