Jump to content


Photo

Alberta Votes 2015: The Winners, the Losers, and the Orange Wave!


  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

#1 *Anastasia

*Anastasia

    — 孱弱新婦 —

  • Governor General
  • 8427 posts

Posted 05 May 2015 - 11:53 PM



Alberta Votes 2015: The Winners, the Losers, and the Orange Wave!




Visual approximation of the only vote
that mattered in the Knesset election.


It is just shy of eleven months since I intrigued Invicta with my first (and until now, last) election roundup. That one was for the provincial elections in Ontario, Canada's largest province, and while there have been elections since around the world, none have really held my attention enough to warrant a roundup post. The sole exception, perhaps, was the election in the Near East, and sadly, as much as I like their cute little ballot papers, summarizing the Zionist election the morning after is a fool's errand if ever there was one.

However, now things have changed. My own province, Alberta, held elections yesterday, and though it is not as big a player population-wise as Ontario, its elections were being watched even more closely across the country. At first, this was simply because we're a major oil and gas producer, and as such are seen as a driving force behind Canada's increasingly fossil-dependent economy. Yet as the campaign progressed, it became more and more obvious that strange things were afoot, and Alberta was not the ideological fortress it is often perceived as.

This early election came about as a result of Alberta's economic hardships as of late. With stagnant or plummeting resource prices, the oil and gas royalties Alberta's government had come to rely on for revenue in the past years have dropped off, sending the province's accountants into red ink-fueled hysterics. In late March, Progressive Conservative Premier Jim Prentice tabled a budget to fix Alberta's woes: a budget which raised personal income taxes across the board and reintroduced a healthcare levy—long-abandoned elsewhere in Canada and scrapped in Alberta in 2009—while leaving corporate taxes (which were already at par with personal income tax) and resource royalties untouched.

The budget provoked a furor from all sections of Alberta's population, who in opinion polls have consistently shown support for hikes to corporate taxes and royalties. Prentice, meanwhile, did his budget no favors when he opined that Albertans should 'look in the mirror' to see who is at fault for Alberta's budgetary troubles: perhaps he meant the fault lay with those who had voted his party into power for the past 44 years? Though the PCs held 70 of the Legislative Assembly's 87 seats, it was clear to all involved such a reactionary budget would need a new mandate, and the writ for the election was dropped 7 April—yes, though last June I mocked the length of American campaigns, now I can mock the length of Ontario's campaign! Six weeks‽ We can do it in four!





Vote breakdown by riding.
Inset from top: Edmonton, Red Deer, Calgary, Lethbridge, Medicine Hat.


Now, in case you missed the figure in the last paragraph, let me reiterate: Alberta's Progressive Conservatives have governed the province for 44 years, having been elected uninterrupted in every election since 1971. That gives us a longer period of single-party rule than Laos, Iraq under Saddam Hussein, and a great many of the Warsaw Pact countries. For many years under the premiership of Ralph Klein, this culture of conservatism was so ingrained in the public psyche that it was simply not politic to say you would vote against him and his PC government, and doing so in many regions of the province was a sure way to find yourself on the wrong end of a public shaming. It's not unsurprising, therefore, that Alberta is known for its conservatism, both at home and abroad: which stands testament to how terribly the PCs have squandered their trust and goodwill in recent years, as their poll numbers dropped drastically throughout the campaign.

This is not to say Prentice's election was going to be a shoe-in. Alberta's 2012 election saw the rise of an opposition, the Wildrose Party, who for many weeks of that election's campaign looked set to win, only to have the rug pulled out from under them at the last moment when Albertans grew suspicious of their radical, right-wing ideology, which at the time placed their party somewhere to the conservative right of the American Tea Party movement. Though they underperformed in that election, and since had their legislative numbers slashed by defections to the ruling PC, they entered this election campaign as a viable alternative to the incumbent PCs, having softened their image somewhat since 2012 and with public sentiment towards Prentice soured by his proposed tax hikes. Wildrose leader Brian Jean positioned himself as 'the only leader who won't raise your taxes.'

In fact, that appeared to be his only position. During the 23 April Leader's Debate, Jean showed himself to be cold and impersonal, and seemed vaguely obsessed with taxes, twisting every question posed to him into a way to make it clear: he wouldn't raise taxes. Although Jean certainly came out poorly in the debate, Premier Prentice fared not much better, appearing a patronizing bully when, in an attempt to claim opponent Rachel Notley proposed raising the corporate tax rate to 20%, he said to her, 'I know that math is difficult.' When it became clear it was in fact Prentice's math that was wrong—and as his party was dogged by allegations a miscalculation during our last royalty review cost the province $13.5 billion in revenue—the Twitter hashtag #MathIsHard was spawned.




The rise—and fall—of titans:
the NDP proves itself the mouse that roared.


And from Prentice's and Jean's disastrous showings in that debate emerged a specter, a specter that has haunted Albertans for lo these many years: the specter of socialism. Notley proved herself both competent and popular in the debate, and her left-wing New Democratic Party, long-seen as the ideological antithesis of the once-unstoppable PCs, suddenly surged into poll lead. The idea that what Albertans wanted was a left-wing replacement for Prentice's government was a strange idea for pollsters and politicians alike. Though he was now taking fire from both the left and the right—and his party had dropped into third-place—Prentice was dismissive of the NDP's sudden surge. 'This is not an NDP province,' he quipped, in staunch defiance of the polls. While he could be forgiven for dismissing what was still seen as potentially little-more than a post-debate blip, his public pronouncements to the effect appeared arrogant to voters, and NDP numbers continued to rise.

Skepticism was rife, however. The Wildrose led the PCs by three points a week before the 2012 election, yet finished a dismal second while the PCs maintained a majority government. If Albertans could be frightened by the prospect of a government far to the right of the PCs, surely they may equally end up frightened by one far to the left. The NDP's poll numbers also seemed concentrated in Edmonton, and the nature of first-past-the-post meant that they'd need more widespread appeal in both the conservative stronghold of Calgary and in rural areas to have a shot at government, no matter how high their numbers shot in the capital. Five days out from the election, however, their numbers began to appear more competitive as they polled high in northern Alberta and even made Calgary look like a three-way race.

The NDP's rising numbers appeared to cause a snowball effect amongst the electorate, and only continued to climb. Among the province's political elite, however, this was not good news. The conservative news media rushed to endorse the incumbent PCs, with the CEO of Postmedia, who owns all four of the province's major newspapers, ordering his editors to make the endorsement against their will. Wildrose leader Brian Jean warned Albertans not to 'accidentally' elect the NDP to punish Prentice. Just as when Prentice opened his mouth, however, this only seemed to bolster the NDP further—Albertans, it turns out, don't like being told what to do or who to vote for. And in a final push to boost the left's chance at government, minor party candidates dropped out of several key ridings and endorsed Notley's New Democrats, cementing their lead in Edmonton, and turning Calgary from a battleground into a certain NDP victory.

Come election day, political analyst Éric Grenier—who has been called Canada's Nate Silver—called the vote for the party who a month earlier was widely expected to finish a distant third- or even fourth-place: the New Democratic Party would form a majority government, and do it by a landslide.

  NDP 53
  WR 21
  PC 11
 
 
 
Majority
Seats
  NDP 41%
  PC 28%
  WR 24%
 LIB
 
 
Popular Vote

The New Democrats, as expected, were swept into power on an orange wave which saw them win 53 of the Legislative Assembly's 87 seats, with 41% of the popular vote—an amazing 31pp swing from their 2012 showing, and a win in every urban seat outside of Calgary. The right-wing Wildrose Party won 21 seats, positioning them as the official opposition, while the 44-year Progressive Conservative dynasty ended in a third-place showing, dropping 59 seats from before the election to a dismal 11 MLAs. Jim Prentice resigned as both party leader and MLA in spite of his victory, which will lead to a by-election in his seat of Calgary–Foothills. The minor Alberta Party also won a seat: Calgary–Elbow, where its leader Greg Clark narrowly passed the PC incumbent, as did the Liberal Party, whose interim leader, Dr David Swann, retained his seat of Calgary–Mountain View.

Although voter turnout has not been confirmed, it is estimated from advanced polls to be approximately 70%, a substantial increase from the 2012 election and part of a continued rise since 2008's record low of 40.6%.

The election's results obviously signal a big change for Alberta. Since its formation as a province in 1905, parties have been elected continuously for long stretches of time, and once replaced have never returned to govern. The Liberal governments which ruled Alberta until 1921 gave way to the United Farmers of Alberta, who led until the shocking Social Credit victory in 1935—and the SoCreds in turn governed Alberta until their upset by the PCs in 1971. Does the victory of the New Democrats position them as Alberta's new natural party of government? Or will this experiment with socialism be a fleeting footnote before the NDP themselves are replaced? And perhaps the bigger question: if they are to be replaced, by whom? Will the PCs manage to break form with their predecessors and return to govern Alberta once more? Only time will tell.

And while Alberta's election results are momentous for the province, there remains the question of what they'll mean to Canada's federal stage. Federal elections are expected to take place this October, and while the incumbent Conservative Party has a tenuous lead over the second-place Liberals, the prospect of the NDP once again rising to prominence federally as they did in 2011 is not something to be ignored. The Conservatives won all but one seat in Alberta in that election—can the wave which propelled Notley's provincial New Democrats to power yesterday carry through to help their federal counterpart five months from now?

All these questions are yet to be answered. These are exciting, yet harrowing, times for Canadian politics.





Member Awards ()

#2 Manoka

Manoka
  • Internal Affairs: Writer
  • 6520 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:A place
  • Ruler Name:deadmanszpiper
  • Nation Name:Manoka
  • IRC Nick:Rawrmansz
  • Nation Link





Posted 06 May 2015 - 12:30 AM

So, NDP is socialist?



Member Awards ()

#3 Redezra

Redezra

    ~>:BAMF:<~

  • Invicta: Knight
  • 7728 posts
  • Gender:Sentient artificial intelligence - identifies as female
  • Location::D
  • Ruler Name:Redezra
  • Nation Name:Jorostopia
  • IRC Nick:Redezra
  • Alliance Name:Invicta
  • Nation Link


Posted 06 May 2015 - 12:57 AM

:o

 

Hooray for leftist victory! Hopefully you get to see some real fiscal change, and a move toward a better economic model~ Oh, and the cutting of that healthcare levy. I mean, what the fuck, that only hurts the disadvantaged.



#4 Justavictim82

Justavictim82

    Better than you

  • Peer
  • 2233 posts
  • Gender:Born without genitals, proud of it
  • Location:Ohio
  • Ruler Name:justavictim82
  • Nation Name:AllaboutthePentiums
  • IRC Nick:Justavictim82[Invicta]
  • Alliance Name:Horse love
  • Nation Link




Posted 06 May 2015 - 10:38 AM

I don't understand why anyone thinking that tax increases passed on to the middle and lower classes is a good idea. They are what drive the economy because they are the ones that spend money. 



Member Awards ()

#5 *Anastasia

*Anastasia

    — 孱弱新婦 —

  • Governor General
  • 8427 posts

Posted 06 May 2015 - 01:55 PM

So, NDP is socialist?

 
More or less. They're perhaps less-so in Alberta than they are in other provinces, but they're certainly progressive left-of-center, so I would apply that label to them.
 

I don't understand why anyone thinking that tax increases passed on to the middle and lower classes is a good idea. They are what drive the economy because they are the ones that spend money. 


My main thing is, I can understand that sometimes, tax increases are necessary, even on those with low or middle incomes. I'm fine with that idea. What I'm not fine with is the idea of raising personal income taxes above the rate corporations pay. We presently have a flat 10% tax for both personal incomes and corporations making over $500,000 a year ('small businesses' earning less than that pay 3%). Prentice wanted to raise individuals' taxes, but keep corporate taxes the same. And that's something I can't abide by. There's no call for people to pay more than businesses.

Member Awards ()

#6 *Anastasia

*Anastasia

    — 孱弱新婦 —

  • Governor General
  • 8427 posts

Posted 06 May 2015 - 01:57 PM

As a minor update, after a recount, the riding of Calgary–Glenmore is tied at 7,015 votes between both the Progressive Conservative incumbent Linda Johnson and New Democrat challenger Anam Kazim. The seat will now go to a judicial review where a judge will examine rejected and spoiled ballots in an attempt to pick a winner; if that fails, the riding will be declared vacant and a by-election scheduled. If the judicial review awards the seat to the Kazim, the adjusted numbers will be NDP 54, WR 21, PC 10, Lib 1, AP 1.

Additionally, voter turnout was confirmed to be 57%—still an increase from last year, but not so marked a one as the advance poll showings were predicting.

Member Awards ()

#7 Shokkou

Shokkou
  • Banned
  • 1922 posts

Posted 07 May 2015 - 05:21 AM

:o

 

Hooray for leftist victory! Hopefully you get to see some real fiscal change, and a move toward a better economic model~ Oh, and the cutting of that healthcare levy. I mean, what the fuck, that only hurts the disadvantaged.

Don't worry, Redezra. We're seeing the pendulum losing its leftward momentum. It's only a matter of time before things start swinging back the right (in more ways than one) direction.



#8 Redezra

Redezra

    ~>:BAMF:<~

  • Invicta: Knight
  • 7728 posts
  • Gender:Sentient artificial intelligence - identifies as female
  • Location::D
  • Ruler Name:Redezra
  • Nation Name:Jorostopia
  • IRC Nick:Redezra
  • Alliance Name:Invicta
  • Nation Link


Posted 08 May 2015 - 12:48 AM

:o

 

Hooray for leftist victory! Hopefully you get to see some real fiscal change, and a move toward a better economic model~ Oh, and the cutting of that healthcare levy. I mean, what the fuck, that only hurts the disadvantaged.

Don't worry, Redezra. We're seeing the pendulum losing its leftward momentum. It's only a matter of time before things start swinging back the right (in more ways than one) direction.

 

Lol. As is the nature of humankind.

 

I continue to put my faith in the construction of Skynet, and the inevitable obliteration of organic life on Earth.


Edited by Redezra, 08 May 2015 - 12:48 AM.


#9 Shokkou

Shokkou
  • Banned
  • 1922 posts

Posted 08 May 2015 - 06:58 AM

Lol. As is the nature of humankind.
 
I continue to put my faith in the construction of Skynet, and the inevitable obliteration of organic life on Earth.

Said Skynet, being created by humans, would be inherently bound by the flaws and biases of its creator. No one is perfect, ergo any such "Skynet" which could be created would be inevitably flawed. As a great sage once said, "There's nothing to do but take naps and wait patiently for death."

hqdefault.jpg



#10 Redezra

Redezra

    ~>:BAMF:<~

  • Invicta: Knight
  • 7728 posts
  • Gender:Sentient artificial intelligence - identifies as female
  • Location::D
  • Ruler Name:Redezra
  • Nation Name:Jorostopia
  • IRC Nick:Redezra
  • Alliance Name:Invicta
  • Nation Link


Posted 08 May 2015 - 08:16 AM

Flawed, yes.

 

But at least I'd be happy knowing everyone else would be dead~



#11 ᗅᗺᗷᗅ

ᗅᗺᗷᗅ

    The Invictan Formerly Known as Jorost

  • Lord Protector
  • 16192 posts
  • Gender:Household pet that walked across the keyboard - male
  • Location:Massachusetts
  • Ruler Name:Jorost
  • Nation Name:Invicta Crownlands
  • IRC Nick:Jorost
  • Alliance Name:Invicta
  • Nation Link






Posted 08 May 2015 - 04:20 PM

This is being taken as a good omen by the left here in the US. They've been calling Alberta the "Texas of Canada," and saying if it can happen there it can happen anywhere. I think it's good news, but, as usual, my countrymen are oversimplifying things. Most Canadian "conservatives" would be Democrats by American standards; we are one of the most right-leaning of the major developed nations. I do see a progressive surge out there, but it's tough to gauge its size at this point. As I mention in another post, Bernie Sanders raised an eye-popping $3 million online within 48 hours of his announcing his candidacy, a feat made all the more impressive by the fact that his website isn't even up and running yet. It's just a "BERNIE '16" banner and a link to donate. And a new poll shows that more people would be comfortable with a gay president than an evangelical one. It's not so much a matter of if gay marriage and legalized marijuana will become the law of the land as when; these things are coming. So yeah, things are moving to the left. So who knows? Maybe we're standing on the verge of a major political shift. Wouldn't that be something?

 

On the other hand, all these same forces seemed to be in play in Britain, where polls had Labour and Tories neck and neck right up to election day, yet in the end the Conservatives won a resounding victory. What does that presage?

 

It's difficult to read too much into foreign political events. As Tip O'Neill once famously said, "All politics is local." In the United States we have fifty individual elections to choose a president, and each one is unique. It certainly appears at this point that the Republican party is in a shambles, and that Hillary Clinton is the odds-on favorite for both the Democratic nomination and the presidency, but there is definitely a strong faction on the left that is not so happy about her inevitability and what she represents. She's certainly not my favorite, that's for sure. If she's the nominee I'll vote for her, because she'll be the lesser of two evils. But maybe people are getting tired of settling for that.



Member Awards ()

#12 *Anastasia

*Anastasia

    — 孱弱新婦 —

  • Governor General
  • 8427 posts

Posted 08 May 2015 - 08:21 PM

They've been calling Alberta the "Texas of Canada," and saying if it can happen there it can happen anywhere. I think it's good news, but, as usual, my countrymen are oversimplifying things.


I would agree with each of these statements individually. I agree that Alberta is like Texas in a number of ways, not the least of which is its extreme conservative tilt. I agree that if it can happen here, it can happen anywhere—but 'can' and 'will' are entirely different concepts. And I agree, to assume a leftist victory here will precipitate leftist victories elsewhere is a cruel oversimplification.

There was a lot at play in the Alberta elections which led to the NDP victory which simply cannot be copy-pasted elsewhere. The issues with the budget, the growing resentment at the static nature of a four-decades-old government, and Rachel Notley's enormous popularity are things which simply can't be applied to other elections. Even the federal NDP, whom I speculated may get a boost, are unlikely to: because while Notley was popular here, the federal NDP leader, Thomas Mulcair, is decidedly unpopular. And therein lies the problem with party politics: when you're voting for a party (or even worse, a party's leader) the actual positions they stand for tend to come second to other issues, and elections run the risk of becoming popularity contests for the swing vote.

Member Awards ()

#13 Shokkou

Shokkou
  • Banned
  • 1922 posts

Posted 09 May 2015 - 07:51 AM

Maybe we're standing on the verge of a major political shift. Wouldn't that be something?

Over the past several decades we've been seeing things bend gradually farther and farther left by varying degrees. I think there is a political shift coming, but it's going to be like when you decide to walk through the path of a thin branch. Sure, it bends as you walk but eventually all that tension is released and it snaps back.

 

Also, the pieces are all in place for an usurpation of the two-party system in the US. There are warning signs of growing resentment towards elements of the Democratic party, but as has been discussed in other threads the Republican party hardly offers an enticing alternative. Add in the general growing sense of distrust and apathy towards the two major parties and you have a perfect recipe for another party to fill the vacuum.

 

A snap back to the right and a void left by the disintegrating Republican party? I think the answer is obvious. Come on Libertarian party.

 

In any case, I don't think this is likely to come about by election time 2016. That would require a relative unknown to gain massive public attention and trust in a very short period of time. Not impossible, but highly unlikely unless something major comes up which the current establishment finds itself completely (and I mean completely) incompetent in the face of on which the challenger could capitalize. That being said, I think if things go as predicted and Hillary wins in the face of this buildup towards a rightward shift, it will only serve to sharpen the swing as "going further left" would of course heighten the tension on the metaphorical branch. Deepening existing resentment, magnifying the opposing reaction.



#14 Manoka

Manoka
  • Internal Affairs: Writer
  • 6520 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:A place
  • Ruler Name:deadmanszpiper
  • Nation Name:Manoka
  • IRC Nick:Rawrmansz
  • Nation Link





Posted 09 May 2015 - 10:46 AM

I hate all of these groups. None of them really focus on the core issues, and seem to be too concerned with making the world match up with their ideas, rather than formulate ideas based on how the world works. It all, quite honestly, seems awful.



Member Awards ()

#15 *Anastasia

*Anastasia

    — 孱弱新婦 —

  • Governor General
  • 8427 posts

Posted 09 May 2015 - 07:26 PM


Maybe we're standing on the verge of a major political shift. Wouldn't that be something?

Over the past several decades we've been seeing things bend gradually farther and farther left by varying degrees.



It never ceases to amaze me how those on the right can look at everything that has happened to America since Reagan and view it as a shift to the left. I swear there's something in your water.

Member Awards ()

#16 Redezra

Redezra

    ~>:BAMF:<~

  • Invicta: Knight
  • 7728 posts
  • Gender:Sentient artificial intelligence - identifies as female
  • Location::D
  • Ruler Name:Redezra
  • Nation Name:Jorostopia
  • IRC Nick:Redezra
  • Alliance Name:Invicta
  • Nation Link


Posted 09 May 2015 - 07:59 PM

Maybe we're standing on the verge of a major political shift. Wouldn't that be something?

Over the past several decades we've been seeing things bend gradually farther and farther left by varying degrees. I think there is a political shift coming, but it's going to be like when you decide to walk through the path of a thin branch. Sure, it bends as you walk but eventually all that tension is released and it snaps back.

 

Also, the pieces are all in place for an usurpation of the two-party system in the US. There are warning signs of growing resentment towards elements of the Democratic party, but as has been discussed in other threads the Republican party hardly offers an enticing alternative. Add in the general growing sense of distrust and apathy towards the two major parties and you have a perfect recipe for another party to fill the vacuum.

 

A snap back to the right and a void left by the disintegrating Republican party? I think the answer is obvious. Come on Libertarian party.

 

In any case, I don't think this is likely to come about by election time 2016. That would require a relative unknown to gain massive public attention and trust in a very short period of time. Not impossible, but highly unlikely unless something major comes up which the current establishment finds itself completely (and I mean completely) incompetent in the face of on which the challenger could capitalize. That being said, I think if things go as predicted and Hillary wins in the face of this buildup towards a rightward shift, it will only serve to sharpen the swing as "going further left" would of course heighten the tension on the metaphorical branch. Deepening existing resentment, magnifying the opposing reaction.

It won't be libertarian. It'll be fascist.



#17 Shokkou

Shokkou
  • Banned
  • 1922 posts

Posted 10 May 2015 - 04:50 AM

It never ceases to amaze me how those on the right can look at everything that has happened to America since Reagan and view it as a shift to the left. I swear there's something in your water.

Yes, I'm sure I could also make a vague and unsubstantiated comment in a transparent attempt to make your position look ridiculous.
 

It won't be libertarian. It'll be fascist.

While I can see where a case could be made to that effect, I think a big part of the growing frustration is with authoritarianism on both the left and right. I don't see fascism gaining ground because it would require more government control, toward which there seems to be growing fatigue.



#18 Redezra

Redezra

    ~>:BAMF:<~

  • Invicta: Knight
  • 7728 posts
  • Gender:Sentient artificial intelligence - identifies as female
  • Location::D
  • Ruler Name:Redezra
  • Nation Name:Jorostopia
  • IRC Nick:Redezra
  • Alliance Name:Invicta
  • Nation Link


Posted 10 May 2015 - 08:10 AM

I think what people are angry at is the government. You just need one passionate, charismatic man to fight against that and implement something far worse for fascism.

 

And given how dumb people tend to be, I always rank that higher than sudden libertarianism.



#19 Shokkou

Shokkou
  • Banned
  • 1922 posts

Posted 10 May 2015 - 08:51 AM

I think what people are angry at is the government. You just need one passionate, charismatic man to fight against that and implement something far worse for fascism.

 

And given how dumb people tend to be, I always rank that higher than sudden libertarianism.

I could see it being one by way of the other. Tear down the bloated government, then turn to the people and say "See how awesome you all are? See how great you are at being free? They said you couldn't do it. Now let's all work together to prove them wrong!" (and by "work together" they of course mean "devour whomever I point out as being a 'threat to your freedom'") There would have to be a period of libertarianism to pay lip service to the idea though, and to get people complacent in "victory." The question then is whether the passionate and charismatic person is a big guy or a false idol (I couldn't resist - also whether or not things go to their head even if they're the former), and whether or not enough people can tell the difference or show others the difference effectively. I will say I see it being a tough sell, since information dissecting the Nazi regime still makes the rounds on the Internet in some fairly mainstream circles. Galleries with photos and information about Nazi Germany still make it to the front page of Imgur every now and then, for example.



#20 Redezra

Redezra

    ~>:BAMF:<~

  • Invicta: Knight
  • 7728 posts
  • Gender:Sentient artificial intelligence - identifies as female
  • Location::D
  • Ruler Name:Redezra
  • Nation Name:Jorostopia
  • IRC Nick:Redezra
  • Alliance Name:Invicta
  • Nation Link


Posted 10 May 2015 - 07:24 PM

Again, people have a great habit of going "yeah but we're not the nazis". 

 

Compare to people drinking and driving because "crashing is something that happens to other people."




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users