First off, let me start by saying this:
Now that we have that groundwork set, I think we all can agree that the only people winning the election so far is CNN and Fox News, with the ratings circus previously known as debates.
Trump appears to have started his campaign as a publicity stunt, and can't get out (this hyperbole is presented by the "shoot someone" quote that is floating around, I honestly don't know if he said it, but it echos the sentiment).
Trump Tl;Dr; a circus campaign that is making ratings too good to pass up. He's going to supernova and implode.
After trump on the republican side, you have the same pack of candidates that you've had for the past 16 years, and nothing has really changed. The spring will shake out the pack until the contenders are left, then I'll pick a 'best candidate'
On the democrat side, the question is about who will win: the heiress, who has been appointed the nominee by the
Illuminati powers that be, or the senator (futurama's professor) with an idea so crazy, it just might work! If sanders can mobilize the youth by making everything free, then he'll buy the election.
The following quote has fuzzy attribution, but I'll put it down to start a closing thought:
A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship
I'll wrap up by invoking both Washington and Eisenhower: Beware the two party system and the military industrial complex. Both cloud the process of democracy, and muddy the waters of Liberty.
Now, by all means, carry on with the ad-homonym attacks on each other. I'll check back in a month or two to see where this goes.