Trump would certainly shake things up, and for that reason alone there is a part of me that kind of wants to see him win. Even if Hillary Clinton has the best of intentions, the most she would ever do is tinker away at the margins; she is not the type to shake things up.
On the other hand, there is a distinct ugliness that goes along with him. Even the name of this thread, calling Hillary Clinton a "kooky bitch," is reflective of this. It's kind of hateful. And I don't think I'm being overly PC. You've heard me talk, read my posts — I don't think I could ever be accused of being overly PC. Name calling like that feels like it is meant to incite a reaction. It's meant to start a fight. When you talk like that, it immediately assumes that there can be no middle ground, no compromise.
I am tired of fighting. No one ever changes anyone's mind, all we do is hone our shitposting skills to a fine edge in preparation for the next fight.
As for Hillary Clinton, she is a lot of things but "kooky" ain't one of them. She is levelheaded, unemotional, and pragmatic. In fact, she is pragmatic to a fault. She is pragmatic to the exclusion of all else, to the point where she is unwilling to take any position or adopt any stance until it has been thoroughly vetted. She is inauthentic and unlikable. She has no core. THAT'S Hillary Clinton's problem. Not that she's a "kooky bitch."
Not that Trump has a core, at least not beyond "TRUMP!" But at least he's entertaining. 
