Jump to content


Photo

Best Star Trek Series


  • Please log in to reply
73 replies to this topic

Poll: Best Star Trek Series (14 member(s) have cast votes)

So which is best?

  1. Star Trek The Original Series (3 votes [21.43%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 21.43%

  2. Star Trek The Next Generation (6 votes [42.86%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 42.86%

  3. Star Trek Voyager (2 votes [14.29%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 14.29%

  4. Star Trek DS-9 (3 votes [21.43%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 21.43%

  5. Star Trek Enterprise (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#61 ᗅᗺᗷᗅ

ᗅᗺᗷᗅ

    The Invictan Formerly Known as Jorost

  • Lord Protector
  • 16192 posts
  • Gender:Household pet that walked across the keyboard - male
  • Location:Massachusetts
  • Ruler Name:Jorost
  • Nation Name:Invicta Crownlands
  • IRC Nick:Jorost
  • Alliance Name:Invicta
  • Nation Link






Posted 17 September 2013 - 10:59 AM

For me the series go TNG > DS9 > TOS > VGR > ENT from best to worst.  I realize this will be sacrilege to all the original series fans, but I find it too campy and the special effects too cheesy.



Member Awards ()

#62 Phate

Phate
  • Admin: Assistant Webmaster
  • 3108 posts
  • Gender:Sentient artificial intelligence - identifies as male
  • Location:West Coast is Best Coast
  • BJ Points:Over 9000
  • Ruler Name:phate408
  • Nation Name:Belgrade
  • IRC Nick:Phate
  • Alliance Name:Invicta
  • Nation Link








Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:04 PM

Nah, sacrilege would be my preference:

 

TNG > VGR > ENT > DS9 > TOS



Member Awards ()

#63 Haflinger

Haflinger

    Flipper

  • Foreign Diplomat
  • 10259 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Ruler Name:Haflinger
  • Nation Name:Llonach
  • IRC Nick:Haflinger
  • Nation Link

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:07 PM

I have a split view of TOS. Season 3 of TOS includes the worst televised Star Trek of all time, even worse than the cartoon which was also wretched. I like a lot of Seasons 1 and 2, but the quality varies quite a lot from one episode to another. There's some gems in there but duds too.

 

I find all Star Trek to be very campy, it's what I like about it. B-)



Member Awards ()

#64 m3g4tr0n

m3g4tr0n
  • Former Member
  • 1422 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Texas
  • Ruler Name:m3g4tr0n
  • Nation Name:Megatopia
  • IRC Nick:m3g4tr0n|Invicta
  • Alliance Name:Invicta
  • Nation Link

Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:28 PM

It was sooooooooooo duuuuumb.

 

Enterprise? Yes, that was a horrible series.



Member Awards ()

#65 Octavian

Octavian

    Colonel of Everything

  • Former Member
  • 1566 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:United States.
  • Ruler Name:Octavian
  • Nation Name:Trimarine Islands
  • IRC Nick:Colonel_Octavian
  • Alliance Name:Invicta
  • Nation Link

Posted 18 September 2013 - 05:11 PM

I'm glad this topic has been so popular.

 

But if I'm honest, Enterprise's storyline wasn't that good, it was several seasons of "omg we gotta go find/beat these bad guys" While TNG actually had other kinds of storylines.

The snippet of the Enterprise-J I found quite cool. :)



Member Awards ()

#66 ᗅᗺᗷᗅ

ᗅᗺᗷᗅ

    The Invictan Formerly Known as Jorost

  • Lord Protector
  • 16192 posts
  • Gender:Household pet that walked across the keyboard - male
  • Location:Massachusetts
  • Ruler Name:Jorost
  • Nation Name:Invicta Crownlands
  • IRC Nick:Jorost
  • Alliance Name:Invicta
  • Nation Link






Posted 18 September 2013 - 07:27 PM

The problem with ENT was that although it was meant to be the precursor to TOS, it was written and produced as if it were the precursor to TNG and TOS never existed.  Case in point:  In the very first TOS episode, "The Cage," there are no phasers, they use lasers.  And warp speed is a BIG deal, with the crew putting on goggles and hanging on for dear life.  (They also refer to it as "time warp," which is interesting.)  But on ENT, they already had "phase pistols" and warp speed was as routine as it is in every other Star Trek franchise.

 

The ENT Enterprise was supposed to be more primitive than good ole NCC-1701 from TOS, but it looked more sophisticated.  So too was humanity's knowledge of the universe, meeting enemies like the Ferengi literally centuries before they should be known.  By the end they were even using transporters pretty regularly, another slap in the face to established continuity.

 

ENT had a lot of potential.  It could have been a fun, campy paean to not only TOS but classic science fiction in general, and explored some of those classic tropes through a modern lens.  Instead it was just TNG III, VGR being TNG II.  Say what you will about DS9, at least it wasn't the same exact thing again.

 

(Which is not to say that either of these series don't have some good episodes.  ENT did some cool stuff with the Vulcans, showing the evolution of their society, as well as the with Andorians, a race from TOS that we hadn't seen very often.  Similarly, VGR's "Year of Hell" cycle was terrific.) 



Member Awards ()

#67 m3g4tr0n

m3g4tr0n
  • Former Member
  • 1422 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Texas
  • Ruler Name:m3g4tr0n
  • Nation Name:Megatopia
  • IRC Nick:m3g4tr0n|Invicta
  • Alliance Name:Invicta
  • Nation Link

Posted 19 September 2013 - 12:09 PM

Yes, Enterprise was weaksauce.



Member Awards ()

#68 Haflinger

Haflinger

    Flipper

  • Foreign Diplomat
  • 10259 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Ruler Name:Haflinger
  • Nation Name:Llonach
  • IRC Nick:Haflinger
  • Nation Link

Posted 20 September 2013 - 02:41 PM

I would also like to just put in here the disclaimer that the Star Trek animated series was incredibly horrible, and Enterprise was much better than it.



Member Awards ()

#69 Phate

Phate
  • Admin: Assistant Webmaster
  • 3108 posts
  • Gender:Sentient artificial intelligence - identifies as male
  • Location:West Coast is Best Coast
  • BJ Points:Over 9000
  • Ruler Name:phate408
  • Nation Name:Belgrade
  • IRC Nick:Phate
  • Alliance Name:Invicta
  • Nation Link








Posted 20 September 2013 - 02:43 PM

There was an animated series? o.O



Member Awards ()

#70 Haflinger

Haflinger

    Flipper

  • Foreign Diplomat
  • 10259 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Ruler Name:Haflinger
  • Nation Name:Llonach
  • IRC Nick:Haflinger
  • Nation Link

Posted 20 September 2013 - 02:44 PM

Yes. It was made in the early 70s when it was becoming clear that Star Trek was going to be a hit in syndication. It's amazingly bad.



Member Awards ()

#71 Phate

Phate
  • Admin: Assistant Webmaster
  • 3108 posts
  • Gender:Sentient artificial intelligence - identifies as male
  • Location:West Coast is Best Coast
  • BJ Points:Over 9000
  • Ruler Name:phate408
  • Nation Name:Belgrade
  • IRC Nick:Phate
  • Alliance Name:Invicta
  • Nation Link








Posted 20 September 2013 - 02:46 PM

I could believe that.



Member Awards ()

#72 Justavictim82

Justavictim82

    Better than you

  • Peer
  • 2233 posts
  • Gender:Born without genitals, proud of it
  • Location:Ohio
  • Ruler Name:justavictim82
  • Nation Name:AllaboutthePentiums
  • IRC Nick:Justavictim82[Invicta]
  • Alliance Name:Horse love
  • Nation Link




Posted 20 September 2013 - 10:22 PM

The problem with ENT was that although it was meant to be the precursor to TOS, it was written and produced as if it were the precursor to TNG and TOS never existed. Case in point: In the very first TOS episode, "The Cage," there are no phasers, they use lasers. And warp speed is a BIG deal, with the crew putting on goggles and hanging on for dear life. (They also refer to it as "time warp," which is interesting.) But on ENT, they already had "phase pistols" and warp speed was as routine as it is in every other Star Trek franchise.

The ENT Enterprise was supposed to be more primitive than good ole NCC-1701 from TOS, but it looked more sophisticated. So too was humanity's knowledge of the universe, meeting enemies like the Ferengi literally centuries before they should be known. By the end they were even using transporters pretty regularly, another slap in the face to established continuity.

ENT had a lot of potential. It could have been a fun, campy paean to not only TOS but classic science fiction in general, and explored some of those classic tropes through a modern lens. Instead it was just TNG III, VGR being TNG II. Say what you will about DS9, at least it wasn't the same exact thing again.

(Which is not to say that either of these series don't have some good episodes. ENT did some cool stuff with the Vulcans, showing the evolution of their society, as well as the with Andorians, a race from TOS that we hadn't seen very often. Similarly, VGR's "Year of Hell" cycle was terrific.)


This... minus maybe the Year of Hell, which was ok but not as vaunted as some has said. Like Jor said, the reason I enjoy DS9 the most is maybe because it has by far the most serious tone of any of the series as well. Even Scott Bakula couldn't save that abhorrition that was ENT.

Member Awards ()

#73 ᗅᗺᗷᗅ

ᗅᗺᗷᗅ

    The Invictan Formerly Known as Jorost

  • Lord Protector
  • 16192 posts
  • Gender:Household pet that walked across the keyboard - male
  • Location:Massachusetts
  • Ruler Name:Jorost
  • Nation Name:Invicta Crownlands
  • IRC Nick:Jorost
  • Alliance Name:Invicta
  • Nation Link






Posted 21 September 2013 - 02:21 PM

Even Scott Bakula?  When has Scott Bakula ever been good in anything?  And before you say Quantum Leap, stop for a moment and think how much better that show could have been with someone else as the star.  The guy's a poor man's Shatner.



Member Awards ()

#74 Haflinger

Haflinger

    Flipper

  • Foreign Diplomat
  • 10259 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Ruler Name:Haflinger
  • Nation Name:Llonach
  • IRC Nick:Haflinger
  • Nation Link

Posted 21 September 2013 - 05:02 PM

Scott Bakula was OK in Enterprise. I was sorta surprised actually, I was expecting to hate him, as I consider Quantum Leap to be a nightmare show, perhaps almost as bad as Starlost.



Member Awards ()


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users